COMPARE · RETELL

OpenPhn vs Retell.

Telephony + LLM for call centers.

POSITIONING

Retell specializes in long-running call-center deployments — IVR, queue handoff, live agent assist. Strong if you're replacing a human call-center seat.

Stay on Retell when…

  • You're replacing inbound call-center seats at scale.
  • You need queue management, agent-assist, and live supervisor barge-in.
  • Your integration target is a CCaaS (Five9, Genesys, Talkdesk) not a software agent.

Switch to OpenPhn when…

  • You're NOT running a call center — you're running an agent that occasionally dials.
  • You want webhook-native outcomes, not CCaaS integration.
  • You want Python + TypeScript SDKs that feel like Stripe, not a telephony platform.
FEATURE COMPARISON

Line by line.

CAPABILITYOPENPHNRETELL
CORE
Schema-first outcomes (you declare the JSON shape)
Webhook-native with HMAC signatures + retries
First-class MCP server
First-class OpenClaw / Hermes / n8n skills
STACK
Bring-your-own telephony (Twilio / Vonage / Telnyx)
Python + TypeScript SDKs
Streaming transcripts on the wire
COMPLIANCE
TCPA call-hour enforcement (server-side)
Suppression list scrubbing
SOC 2 Type IIIn progress
PRICING
Voice + extraction priced separately
No markup on carrier minutes

● full support · ◐ partial or with caveats · ○ not supported

MIGRATION

Moving from Retell.

  1. 01

    Keep Retell for inbound; move outbound to OpenPhn

    If you're running a call center and ALSO need agent-driven outbound, the two coexist cleanly — Retell for the queue, OpenPhn for the outbound dials your agent triggers.

  2. 02

    Map Retell's LLM-router config to outcome_schema

    Where Retell uses LLM routing to branch the call tree, OpenPhn uses the objective + schema. Simpler mental model for most agent use cases.

  3. 03

    Webhook consolidation

    Point Retell's post-call webhook and OpenPhn's delivery webhook at the same endpoint. Route by `X-OpenPhn-Event` vs Retell's event header.

PRICING

Retell has higher per-minute pricing (~$0.15/min voice) for lower-latency routing features that most agent use cases don't need. OpenPhn is cheaper because the platform does less — intentionally.

See the full OpenPhn pricing →

Kick the tires for free.

50 free minutes. No credit card.

Start free →